bugfix reconciliation extractor

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-07 20:16:57 -03:00
parent d84d833694
commit 2c3aa58b59
193 changed files with 1689 additions and 68 deletions

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ from __future__ import annotations
import json
import pytest
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import extract_transaction_parameters
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import extract_transaction_parameters, reconcile_transaction_parameters
class _ContextAwareLLM:
@@ -42,3 +42,370 @@ async def test_contextual_reentry_separates_current_claim_from_prior_context_for
assert "Cobrança Tamboro Mensal" in llm.prompt
assert "user_message: é a de quatorze e noventa e nove" in llm.prompt
assert "Não trate texto do contexto como uma nova afirmação do cliente" in llm.prompt
class _TwoPassContextLLM:
def __init__(self):
self.calls = []
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
self.calls.append(prompt)
# First pass: current utterance provides only the amount.
if "user_message: é a de vinte e cinco e cinquenta" in prompt:
return json.dumps({"subject": None, "valor": 25.50}, ensure_ascii=False)
# Second bounded pass: previous USER utterance provides the missing entity.
if "user_message: não reconheço esse Tamboro Mensal na minha fatura" in prompt:
return json.dumps({"subject": "Tamboro Mensal"}, ensure_ascii=False)
return "{}"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_contextual_reentry_second_pass_recovers_only_missing_candidate_from_prior_user_turn():
from agent_framework.runtime.agent_runtime import AgentRuntimeMixin
class Runtime(AgentRuntimeMixin):
pass
runtime = Runtime()
runtime.llm = _TwoPassContextLLM()
state = {
"route_decision": {
"metadata": {
"contextual_reentry": True,
"original_input": "é a de vinte e cinco e cinquenta",
"relevant_conversation_context": (
"user: não reconheço esse Tamboro Mensal na minha fatura\n"
"assistant: identifiquei duas cobranças de Tamboro Mensal"
),
}
},
"sanitized_input": "é a de vinte e cinco e cinquenta",
}
out = await runtime._extract_transaction_parameters(
state=state,
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
missing_parameters=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={},
)
assert float(out["valor"]) == 25.5
assert out["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert len(runtime.llm.calls) >= 2
class _CoherentTemporalLLM:
"""Simulates the structured decisions expected from temporal reconciliation."""
def __init__(self):
self.prompts = []
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
self.prompts.append(prompt)
low = prompt.lower()
# Product A + value X established.
if "user_message: na verdade é tim fashion mensal" in low:
return json.dumps({"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "resolved", "value": "TIM Fashion Mensal", "source": "current"},
# Previous 14.99 was tied to the former product and must not be transplanted.
"valor": {"decision": "clear", "value": None, "source": "history:1"},
}}, ensure_ascii=False)
if "user_message: na verdade é produto inexistente" in low:
return json.dumps({"fields": {
# Keep the newest candidate so authoritative validation can reject it.
"subject": {"decision": "resolved", "value": "Produto Inexistente", "source": "current"},
"valor": {"decision": "clear", "value": None, "source": "history:1"},
}}, ensure_ascii=False)
if "user_message: desculpa, era tamboro mensal mesmo" in low:
return json.dumps({"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "resolved", "value": "Tamboro Mensal", "source": "current"},
# Full temporal text makes the old amount coherent again with the restored product.
"valor": {"decision": "resolved", "value": 14.99, "source": "history:2"},
}}, ensure_ascii=False)
return json.dumps({"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "preserve", "value": None, "source": "state"},
"valor": {"decision": "preserve", "value": None, "source": "state"},
}}, ensure_ascii=False)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_reconciliation_product_change_rechecks_old_value_as_part_of_coherent_set():
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import reconcile_transaction_parameters
llm = _CoherentTemporalLLM()
out = await reconcile_transaction_parameters(
llm,
text="na verdade é TIM Fashion Mensal",
conversational_context=(
"history:1: user: é R$ 14,99\n"
"history:2: user: quero contestar Tamboro Mensal"
),
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={"subject": "Tamboro Mensal", "valor": 14.99},
parameter_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do serviço, produto, item ou cobrança objeto da contestação."},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "Valor monetário associado ao item objeto da contestação."},
},
tool_description="Contesta uma cobrança após validação.",
)
assert out["values"] == {"subject": "TIM Fashion Mensal"}
assert out["clear_fields"] == ["valor"]
assert out["provenance"]["subject"] == "current"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_reconciliation_invalid_new_product_does_not_erase_history_or_fall_back_silently():
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import reconcile_transaction_parameters
llm = _CoherentTemporalLLM()
history = (
"history:1: user: é R$ 14,99\n"
"history:2: user: quero contestar Tamboro Mensal"
)
out = await reconcile_transaction_parameters(
llm,
text="na verdade é Produto Inexistente",
conversational_context=history,
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={"subject": "Tamboro Mensal", "valor": 14.99},
parameter_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do serviço, produto, item ou cobrança objeto da contestação."},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "Valor monetário associado ao item objeto da contestação."},
},
tool_description="Contesta uma cobrança após validação.",
)
# The newest candidate stays visible for pre-validation; the old product is not silently restored.
assert out["values"] == {"subject": "Produto Inexistente"}
assert "valor" in out["clear_fields"]
assert "Tamboro Mensal" in llm.prompts[-1] # history remains available to future reconciliation.
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_reconciliation_can_restore_coherent_old_value_when_product_is_explicitly_restored():
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import reconcile_transaction_parameters
llm = _CoherentTemporalLLM()
out = await reconcile_transaction_parameters(
llm,
text="desculpa, era Tamboro Mensal mesmo",
conversational_context=(
"history:1: user: na verdade é Produto Inexistente\n"
"history:2: user: é R$ 14,99\n"
"history:3: user: quero contestar Tamboro Mensal"
),
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={},
parameter_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do serviço, produto, item ou cobrança objeto da contestação."},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "Valor monetário associado ao item objeto da contestação."},
},
tool_description="Contesta uma cobrança após validação.",
)
assert out["values"] == {"subject": "Tamboro Mensal", "valor": 14.99}
assert out["provenance"] == {"subject": "current", "valor": "history:2"}
def test_temporal_context_priority_places_assistant_before_older_user_history():
from agent_framework.runtime.agent_runtime import AgentRuntimeMixin
context = (
"user: tem uma cobrança aqui que eu não reconheço\n"
"assistant: Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99; TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10,00."
)
prioritized = AgentRuntimeMixin._transaction_context_priority_view(context)
assert "priority_3_previous_assistant_tool_or_evidence_context:" in prioritized
assert "priority_4_previous_user_utterances:" in prioritized
assert prioritized.index("assistant: Cobrança Tamboro Mensal") < prioritized.index("user: tem uma cobrança")
class _AssistantRelationshipReconcilerLLM:
def __init__(self):
self.prompt = ""
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
self.prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
# Simula o comportamento desejado: a fala atual dá o valor, enquanto a
# relação item->valor está numa resposta anterior do assistant.
assert "user_message: é a de quatorze e noventa e nove" in self.prompt
assert "priority_3_previous_assistant_tool_or_evidence_context:" in self.prompt
assert "assistant: Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99" in self.prompt
assert "anchor_relation_candidates:" in self.prompt
assert "anchor[valor=14.99]" in self.prompt
return json.dumps({"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "resolved", "value": "Tamboro Mensal", "source": "history:1"},
"valor": {"decision": "resolved", "value": 14.99, "source": "current"},
}}, ensure_ascii=False)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_reconciler_can_use_grounded_assistant_relationship_after_current_only_extraction_is_incomplete():
from agent_framework.runtime.agent_runtime import AgentRuntimeMixin
class Runtime(AgentRuntimeMixin):
pass
runtime = Runtime()
runtime.llm = _AssistantRelationshipReconcilerLLM()
runtime.tool_router = type("TR", (), {
"registry": type("REG", (), {
"get_tool": staticmethod(lambda name: type("CFG", (), {
"requires": ["subject", "valor"],
"args_schema": {
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do item ou cobrança a contestar."},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "Valor monetário do item a contestar."},
},
"description": "Contesta uma cobrança após validação.",
})())
})(),
"resolve_execution_policy": staticmethod(lambda name, arguments=None: {
"operation_type": "transactional",
"requires": ["subject", "valor"],
}),
})()
state = {
"sanitized_input": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"user_text": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"route_decision": {"metadata": {
"contextual_reentry": True,
"original_input": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"relevant_conversation_context": (
"user: tem uma cobrança aqui que eu não reconheço\n"
"assistant: Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99; TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10,00."
),
}},
}
# O happy path corrente só consegue o valor; o subject fica faltando.
class _CurrentOnlyLLM:
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
return json.dumps({"valor": 14.99}, ensure_ascii=False)
original_llm = runtime.llm
runtime.llm = _CurrentOnlyLLM()
current = await runtime._extract_transaction_parameters_current_only(
state,
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
missing_parameters=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={},
)
assert current == {"valor": 14.99}
runtime.llm = original_llm
reconciled = await runtime._reconcile_transaction_parameters(
state,
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments=current,
)
assert reconciled["values"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert float(reconciled["values"]["valor"]) == 14.99
assert "(3) respostas anteriores do assistente" in runtime.llm.prompt
class _UnifiedAnchorScanLLM:
def __init__(self):
self.calls = []
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
self.calls.append(prompt)
assert "UMA ÚNICA VARREDURA TEMPORAL" in prompt
assert "known_parameters: {\"valor\": 14.99}" in prompt
assert "missing_parameters: [\"subject\", \"data\"]" in prompt
assert "anchor_relation_candidates:" in prompt
assert "anchor[valor=14.99]" in prompt
assert "Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99" in prompt
return json.dumps({"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "resolved", "value": "Tamboro Mensal", "source": "history:1"},
"valor": {"decision": "preserve", "value": None, "source": "state"},
"data": {"decision": "resolved", "value": "01/11/2025", "source": "history:1"},
}}, ensure_ascii=False)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_reconciler_single_scan_uses_all_known_fields_as_anchors_and_resolves_all_missing_fields():
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import reconcile_transaction_parameters
llm = _UnifiedAnchorScanLLM()
result = await reconcile_transaction_parameters(
llm,
text="é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor", "data"],
known_arguments={"valor": 14.99},
parameter_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do item ou cobrança a contestar."},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "Valor monetário do item a contestar."},
"data": {"type": "string", "description": "Data da cobrança selecionada."},
},
tool_description="Contesta uma cobrança após validação.",
conversational_context=(
"priority_3_previous_assistant_tool_or_evidence_context:\n"
"history:1: assistant: Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99 no dia 01/11/2025 * "
"TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10,00 no dia 01/11/2025.\n"
"priority_4_previous_user_utterances:\n"
"history:2: user: tem uma cobrança aqui que eu não reconheço"
),
)
assert len(llm.calls) == 1
assert result["values"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert float(result["values"]["valor"]) == 14.99
assert result["values"]["data"] == "01/11/2025"
assert result["provenance"]["subject"] == "history:1"
class _AssistantEvidenceSegmentationLLM:
def __init__(self):
self.calls = 0
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
import json
self.calls += 1
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
evidence = json.loads(prompt.split("evidence_blocks: ", 1)[1].split("\n", 1)[0])
anchored = [
block for block in evidence
if block.get("role") == "assistant"
and any(match.get("field") == "valor" and float(match.get("value")) == 14.99 for match in block.get("anchor_matches", []))
]
assert len(anchored) == 1
assert "Tamboro Mensal" in anchored[0]["text"]
assert "TIM Fashion" not in anchored[0]["text"]
assert "Neymar" not in anchored[0]["text"]
return {
"content": json.dumps({
"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "resolved", "value": "Tamboro Mensal", "source": "history:1"},
"valor": {"decision": "preserve", "value": 14.99, "source": "state"},
}
}, ensure_ascii=False)
}
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reconciler_segments_assistant_list_so_known_anchor_resolves_missing_field():
llm = _AssistantEvidenceSegmentationLLM()
result = await reconcile_transaction_parameters(
llm,
text="é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={"valor": 14.99},
parameter_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do item ou cobrança a contestar."},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "Valor monetário do item a contestar."},
},
conversational_context=(
"priority_3_previous_assistant_tool_or_evidence_context:\n"
"history:1: assistant: Houve as cobranças: * Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99 no dia 01/11/25. "
"* Cobrança TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10,00 no dia 01/11/25. "
"* Cobrança Neymar Jr no valor de R$ 12,00 no dia 01/11/25.\n"
"priority_4_previous_user_utterances:\n"
"history:2: user: tem uma cobrança aqui que eu não reconheço"
),
)
assert llm.calls == 1
assert result["values"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert float(result["values"]["valor"]) == 14.99

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
import json
import pytest
from types import SimpleNamespace
from agent_framework.runtime.agent_runtime import AgentRuntimeMixin
class _Router:
def __init__(self):
self.registry = SimpleNamespace(
tools={"contestar_cobranca": object(), "validar_contestacao": object()},
get_tool=lambda name: SimpleNamespace(
description="Contesta uma cobrança após validação",
args_schema={
"subject": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Referência a um item concreto e identificável da fatura",
"user_prompt": "Qual cobrança ou item você deseja contestar?",
},
"valor": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Valor monetário explicitamente associado pelo cliente ao item",
"user_prompt": "Qual é o valor da cobrança que você deseja contestar?",
},
},
requires=["subject", "valor"],
) if name == "contestar_cobranca" else None,
)
def resolve_execution_policy(self, tool_name, arguments=None):
if tool_name == "contestar_cobranca":
return {
"operation_type": "transactional",
"require_confirmation": True,
"requires": ["subject", "valor"],
"policy_source": "test",
"pre_validation": {"enabled": True, "tool": "validar_contestacao", "fail_open": False},
}
return {"operation_type": "read_only", "require_confirmation": False, "policy_source": "test"}
class _LLM:
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
generation = kwargs.get("generation_name")
if generation == "llm.transaction_parameter_current_only":
low = prompt.lower()
fields = json.loads(prompt.split("Formato: ", 1)[1])
out = dict(fields)
if "quatorze e noventa e nove" in low:
if "valor" in out:
out["valor"] = 14.99
elif "vinte e cinco e cinquenta" in low:
if "valor" in out:
out["valor"] = 25.50
elif "dezenove e noventa e nove" in low:
if "valor" in out:
out["valor"] = 19.99
return {"content": json.dumps(out, ensure_ascii=False)}
if generation == "llm.transaction_parameter_extraction":
# Deliberately leave subject unresolved so scenario 8 exercises the
# unique anchored structural candidate + authoritative validator path.
return {"content": json.dumps({"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "unresolved", "value": None, "source": ""},
"valor": {"decision": "preserve", "value": None, "source": "state"},
}}, ensure_ascii=False)}
return {"content": "{}"}
class _Runtime(AgentRuntimeMixin):
def __init__(self):
self.tool_router = _Router()
self.llm = _LLM()
self.calls = []
async def _call_mcp_tool(self, tool_name, arguments, state):
self.calls.append((tool_name, dict(arguments)))
if tool_name != "validar_contestacao":
return {"ok": True, "tool_name": tool_name, "result": {"status": "OK"}}
subject = str(arguments.get("subject") or "")
valor = arguments.get("valor")
# Canonicalize the raw anchored fragment from scenario 8.
if "Tamboro Mensal" in subject:
canonical = "Tamboro Mensal"
else:
return {"ok": True, "eligible": False, "status": "NEEDS_PARAMETER", "parameter": "subject"}
if float(valor) not in {14.99, 19.99}:
return {
"ok": True,
"eligible": False,
"status": "NEEDS_PARAMETER",
"parameter": "valor",
"clear_fields": ["resolved_value"],
}
return {
"ok": True,
"eligible": True,
"transaction_decision": {
"resolved_arguments": {"subject": canonical, "valor": float(valor)}
},
}
def _collecting_state(arguments, text, *, metadata=None, context=None):
return {
"user_text": text,
"sanitized_input": text,
"route": "contestacao_agent",
"intent": "state:COLLECTING_CONTESTACAO_PARAMETERS",
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"active_transaction": {
"transaction_id": "tx",
"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca",
"arguments": dict(arguments),
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"parameter_schema": {
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Referência a um item concreto e identificável da fatura"},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "Valor monetário explicitamente associado pelo cliente ao item"},
},
"parameter_conversational_context": context or "",
},
"selected_tool_call": {"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca", "arguments": dict(arguments)},
"missing_parameters": [x for x in ["subject", "valor"] if arguments.get(x) in (None, "")],
"route_decision": {"metadata": metadata or {}},
}
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_scenario8_value_anchor_reconciles_subject_then_awaits_confirmation():
runtime = _Runtime()
context = (
"user: tem uma cobrança aqui que eu não reconheço\n"
"assistant: Analisando a fatura. * Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14.99 no dia 01/11/25. "
"* Cobrança TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10.00 no dia 01/11/25."
)
state = _collecting_state(
{},
"é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
metadata={
"contextual_reentry": True,
"original_input": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"relevant_conversation_context": context,
},
context=context,
)
result = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state, tools=[])
assert state["transaction_status"] == "AWAITING_CONFIRMATION"
assert state["missing_parameters"] == []
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["valor"] == 14.99
assert state["transaction_pre_validation"]["eligible"] is True
assert result[-1]["awaiting_confirmation"] is True
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_scenario16_invalid_value_clears_only_value_and_preserves_subject():
runtime = _Runtime()
state = _collecting_state({"subject": "Tamboro Mensal"}, "é a de vinte e cinco e cinquenta")
result = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state, tools=[])
assert state["transaction_status"] == "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS"
assert state["active_transaction"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert "valor" not in state["active_transaction"]["arguments"]
assert state["missing_parameters"] == ["valor"]
assert result[-1]["collecting_parameters"] is True
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_scenario16_current_turn_correction_updates_existing_value_then_awaits_confirmation():
runtime = _Runtime()
state = _collecting_state(
{"subject": "Tamboro Mensal", "valor": 25.50},
"desculpa é a de dezenove e noventa e nove",
)
# The old value exists, so missing_parameters alone must NOT restrict which
# current-turn fields may be corrected.
state["missing_parameters"] = ["subject"]
result = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state, tools=[])
assert state["transaction_status"] == "AWAITING_CONFIRMATION"
assert state["missing_parameters"] == []
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["valor"] == 19.99
assert state["transaction_pre_validation"]["eligible"] is True
assert result[-1]["awaiting_confirmation"] is True

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
import json
from types import SimpleNamespace
import pytest
from agent_framework.routing.enterprise_router import EnterpriseRouter
from agent_framework.runtime.agent_runtime import AgentRuntimeMixin
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import reconcile_transaction_parameters
class _RouterLLM:
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
prompt = messages[-1]["content"] if isinstance(messages[-1], dict) else str(messages[-1])
if kwargs.get("profile_name") == "transaction_parameter_extraction" or "pending_parameters:" in prompt:
return json.dumps({"subject": None, "valor": None})
if "esquece" in prompt.lower():
return json.dumps({
"decision": "ABANDON",
"intent": "billing_invoice_explanation",
"agent": "billing_agent",
"confidence": 0.99,
"reason": "abandono explícito da transação atual",
})
return json.dumps({
"decision": "SHIFT",
"intent": "contas_vas_cancel",
"agent": "vas_agent",
"confidence": 0.99,
"reason": "classificação genérica motivada por cancelar",
})
def _router(tmp_path):
routing = tmp_path / "routing.yaml"
routing.write_text(
"""
router:
fallback_agent: contestacao_agent
confidence_threshold: 0.70
state_policies:
- state: COLLECTING_PARAMETERS
agent: contestacao_agent
intents:
- name: contas_contestation
agent: contestacao_agent
priority: 10
keywords: [contestar]
- name: contas_vas_cancel
agent: vas_agent
priority: 20
keywords: [cancelar]
- name: billing_invoice_explanation
agent: billing_agent
priority: 30
keywords: [fatura]
""",
encoding="utf-8",
)
return EnterpriseRouter(
SimpleNamespace(
ROUTING_CONFIG_PATH=str(routing),
ENABLE_LLM_ROUTER=True,
ENABLE_ROUTE_STICKINESS=False,
),
llm=_RouterLLM(),
)
def _active_state(message):
return {
"user_text": message,
"sanitized_input": message,
"next_state": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"missing_parameters": ["valor"],
"intent": "state:COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"active_agent": "contestacao_agent",
"active_transaction": {
"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca",
"arguments": {"subject": "Tamboro Mensal"},
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"started_from_intent": "contas_contestation",
"parameter_schema": {"valor": {"type": "number"}},
},
}
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_generic_shift_does_not_interrupt_active_transaction(tmp_path):
decision = await _router(tmp_path).route(_active_state("isso mesmo, pode cancelar"))
assert decision.intent == "state:COLLECTING_PARAMETERS"
assert not (decision.metadata or {}).get("transaction_interruption")
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_explicit_abandonment_can_leave_active_transaction(tmp_path):
decision = await _router(tmp_path).route(_active_state("esquece isso, quero ver minha fatura"))
assert decision.intent == "billing_invoice_explanation"
assert decision.metadata["transaction_interruption"] == "explicit_abandonment"
class _PolicyRouter:
def __init__(self):
self.registry = SimpleNamespace(
tools={"contestar_cobranca": object()},
get_tool=lambda name: SimpleNamespace(
selection_keywords=["contestar"],
args_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "item concreto da fatura"},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "valor associado"},
},
requires=["subject", "valor"],
description="Contesta cobrança validada",
),
)
def resolve_execution_policy(self, tool_name, arguments=None):
return {
"operation_type": "transactional",
"require_confirmation": True,
"requires": ["subject", "valor"],
"pre_validation": {"enabled": True, "tool": "validar_contestacao", "fail_open": False},
}
class _UnresolvedReconcileLLM:
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
if kwargs.get("profile_name") == "transaction_parameter_extraction":
if "FOCO PRINCIPAL DA RECONCILIAÇÃO" in prompt:
return {"content": json.dumps({
"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "unresolved", "value": None, "source": ""},
"valor": {"decision": "preserve", "value": 14.99, "source": "state"},
}
})}
return {"content": json.dumps({"subject": None, "valor": 14.99})}
return {"content": "{}"}
class _CandidateRuntime(AgentRuntimeMixin):
def __init__(self):
self.tool_router = _PolicyRouter()
self.llm = _UnresolvedReconcileLLM()
self.calls = []
async def _call_mcp_tool(self, tool_name, arguments, state):
self.calls.append((tool_name, dict(arguments)))
if tool_name == "validar_contestacao":
subject = str(arguments.get("subject") or "")
if "Tamboro Mensal" in subject and float(arguments.get("valor")) == 14.99:
return {
"ok": True,
"tool_name": tool_name,
"result": {
"eligible": True,
"status": "ELIGIBLE",
"transaction_decision": {
"resolved_arguments": {"subject": "Tamboro Mensal", "valor": 14.99}
},
},
}
return {"ok": True, "tool_name": tool_name, "result": {"eligible": False, "status": "NEEDS_PARAMETER", "parameter": "subject"}}
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_unique_anchored_block_is_candidate_only_and_prevalidator_canonicalizes():
runtime = _CandidateRuntime()
state = {
"user_text": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"sanitized_input": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"mcp_tools": ["contestar_cobranca"],
"route": "contestacao_agent",
"active_agent": "contestacao_agent",
"intent": "contas_contestation",
"route_decision": {"metadata": {}},
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"missing_parameters": ["subject"],
"active_transaction": {
"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca",
"arguments": {"valor": 14.99},
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"requires": ["subject", "valor"],
"parameter_schema": {
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "item concreto da fatura"},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "valor associado"},
},
"parameter_conversational_context": (
"history:1: assistant: Houve: * Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99 no dia 01/11/25. "
"* Cobrança TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10,00 no dia 01/11/25."
),
},
"selected_tool_call": {"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca", "arguments": {"valor": 14.99}},
}
result = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state, tools=[])
assert state["transaction_status"] == "AWAITING_CONFIRMATION"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["valor"] == 14.99
assert state["transaction_parameter_reconciliation"]["applied_structural_candidates"] == {
"subject": "unique_anchored_evidence_block"
}
validator_args = runtime.calls[0][1]
assert validator_args["subject"].startswith("Cobrança Tamboro Mensal")
assert result[-1]["awaiting_confirmation"] is True
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_current_turn_value_then_unique_anchor_reaches_confirmation_from_empty_transaction():
"""Regression for Contas scenario 08: current amount first, temporal subject second."""
runtime = _CandidateRuntime()
state = {
"user_text": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"sanitized_input": "é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
"mcp_tools": ["contestar_cobranca"],
"route": "contestacao_agent",
"active_agent": "contestacao_agent",
"intent": "contas_contestation",
"route_decision": {"metadata": {}},
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"missing_parameters": ["subject", "valor"],
"active_transaction": {
"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca",
"arguments": {},
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"requires": ["subject", "valor"],
"parameter_schema": {
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "item concreto da fatura"},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "valor monetário associado"},
},
"parameter_conversational_context": (
"history:1: assistant: Houve: * Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99 no dia 01/11/25. "
"* Cobrança TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10,00 no dia 01/11/25."
),
},
"selected_tool_call": {"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca", "arguments": {}},
}
result = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state, tools=[])
assert state["transaction_parameter_collection"]["resolved_fields"] == ["valor"]
assert state["transaction_status"] == "AWAITING_CONFIRMATION"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["valor"] == 14.99
assert result[-1]["awaiting_confirmation"] is True
class _ClearMissingSubjectReconcileLLM(_UnresolvedReconcileLLM):
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
if kwargs.get("profile_name") == "transaction_parameter_extraction":
if "FOCO PRINCIPAL DA RECONCILIAÇÃO" in prompt:
return {"content": json.dumps({
"fields": {
"subject": {"decision": "clear", "value": None, "source": "history:1"},
"valor": {"decision": "preserve", "value": 14.99, "source": "state"},
}
})}
return {"content": json.dumps({"subject": None, "valor": 14.99})}
return {"content": "{}"}
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_initially_missing_subject_clear_still_allows_unique_anchored_candidate():
"""Scenario 08: clear on an already-missing field must not suppress candidate fallback."""
rec = await reconcile_transaction_parameters(
_ClearMissingSubjectReconcileLLM(),
text="é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
tool_name="contestar_cobranca",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={"valor": 14.99},
parameter_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "item concreto da fatura"},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "valor monetário associado"},
},
tool_description="Contesta uma cobrança identificada por item e valor",
conversational_context=(
"priority_3_previous_assistant_tool_or_evidence_context:\n"
"history:1: assistant: Analisando a sua fatura atual. * Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99 no dia 01/11/25. "
"* Cobrança TIM Fashion Mensal no valor de R$ 10,00 no dia 01/11/25.\n"
"priority_4_previous_user_utterances:\n"
"history:2: user: tem uma cobrança aqui que eu não reconheço"
),
)
assert rec["decisions"]["subject"] == "clear"
assert rec["clear_fields"] == ["subject"]
assert rec["candidates"] == {
"subject": "Cobrança Tamboro Mensal no valor de R$ 14,99 no dia 01/11/25."
}
assert rec["candidate_provenance"] == {
"subject": "unique_anchored_evidence_block"
}

View File

@@ -643,3 +643,129 @@ intents: []
decision = await router.route(state)
assert decision.metadata["transaction_confirmation_decision"] == "confirm"
assert decision.metadata["transaction_confirmation_source"] == "deterministic"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_collecting_preserves_resolved_required_fields_and_only_extracts_currently_missing():
class Runtime(_Runtime):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.pending_seen = None
async def _extract_transaction_parameters(
self, state, *, tool_name, missing_parameters, known_arguments=None
):
self.pending_seen = list(missing_parameters)
# Simulate the value extracted for the only missing field. A resolved
# required field must not be offered back to the semantic extractor.
return {"reason": "desisti da compra"}
runtime = Runtime()
state = {
"user_text": "desisti da compra",
"sanitized_input": "desisti da compra",
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"missing_parameters": ["reason"],
"mcp_tools": ["solicitar_devolucao"],
"active_transaction": {
"tool_name": "solicitar_devolucao",
"arguments": {"order_id": "PED-1001"},
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"parameter_schema": {"order_id": "string", "reason": "string"},
"tool_description": "Abre uma solicitação de devolução de pedido.",
},
"selected_tool_call": {
"tool_name": "solicitar_devolucao",
"arguments": {"order_id": "PED-1001"},
},
"route_decision": {"metadata": {}},
"route": "support_agent",
"intent": "state:COLLECTING_SUPPORT_PARAMETERS",
}
result = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state)
assert runtime.pending_seen == ["reason"]
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["order_id"] == "PED-1001"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["reason"] == "desisti da compra"
assert result[-1]["awaiting_confirmation"] is True
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_correction_of_missing_numeric_value_does_not_reopen_resolved_text_entity():
class Runtime(_Runtime):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.pending_seen = None
async def _extract_transaction_parameters(
self, state, *, tool_name, missing_parameters, known_arguments=None
):
self.pending_seen = list(missing_parameters)
# If subject were incorrectly offered again, a semantic extractor
# could reinterpret the monetary phrase as an entity. The runtime
# contract must expose only the missing numeric field here.
out = {"valor": 19.99}
if "subject" in missing_parameters:
out["subject"] = "cobrança de R$ 19,99"
return out
runtime = Runtime()
state = {
"user_text": "desculpa é a de dezenove e noventa e nove",
"sanitized_input": "desculpa é a de dezenove e noventa e nove",
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"missing_parameters": ["valor"],
"mcp_tools": ["solicitar_devolucao"],
"active_transaction": {
"tool_name": "solicitar_devolucao",
"arguments": {"order_id": "PED-1001"},
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"parameter_schema": {"order_id": "string", "reason": "string", "valor": "number"},
},
"selected_tool_call": {
"tool_name": "solicitar_devolucao",
"arguments": {"order_id": "PED-1001"},
},
"route_decision": {"metadata": {}},
"route": "support_agent",
"intent": "state:COLLECTING_SUPPORT_PARAMETERS",
}
# This synthetic tool doesn't require valor, so exercise the extraction
# contract directly with the same resolved-text/missing-number shape.
out = await runtime._extract_transaction_parameters(
state,
tool_name="solicitar_devolucao",
missing_parameters=["valor"],
known_arguments={"subject": "Tamboro Mensal"},
)
assert runtime.pending_seen == ["valor"]
assert out == {"valor": 19.99}
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_reconciler_exposes_schema_driven_field_evidence_views_for_missing_fields():
class _LLM:
def __init__(self):
self.prompt = ""
async def ainvoke(self, messages, **kwargs):
self.prompt = messages[0]["content"]
return {"content": '{"fields":{"subject":{"decision":"resolved","value":"Produto A","source":"history:1"},"valor":{"decision":"preserve","value":14.99,"source":"state"}}}'}
from agent_framework.runtime.transaction_parameters import reconcile_transaction_parameters
llm = _LLM()
result = await reconcile_transaction_parameters(
llm,
text="é a de quatorze e noventa e nove",
tool_name="acao_generica",
parameter_names=["subject", "valor"],
known_arguments={"valor": 14.99},
parameter_schema={
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "referência concreta identificável"},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "quantia associada"},
},
conversational_context=(
"priority_3_previous_assistant_tool_or_evidence_context:\n"
"history:1: assistant: * Produto A no atributo 14,99. * Produto B no atributo 10,00."
),
)
assert result["values"]["subject"] == "Produto A"
assert "field_evidence_views:" in llm.prompt
assert '"subject"' in llm.prompt
assert '"anchor_matches"' in llm.prompt

View File

@@ -1058,11 +1058,12 @@ class _CorrectionDuringCollectingLLM:
prompt = messages[-1]["content"]
self.prompts.append(prompt)
if kwargs.get("profile_name") == "transaction_parameter_extraction":
# Current-only extraction now exposes the requested keys through the
# declarative schema/format rather than the legacy pending_parameters label.
if "current_user_message: desculpa, é a de quatorze e noventa e nove" in prompt:
return {"content": json.dumps({"subject": None, "valor": 14.99}, ensure_ascii=False)}
pending = json.loads(prompt.split("pending_parameters: ", 1)[1].split("\n", 1)[0])
out = {name: None for name in pending}
# O router já resolveu subject a partir do contexto. O runtime ainda
# precisa permitir que a mensagem atual corrija um valor previamente
# coletado, mesmo que valor não esteja em missing_parameters.
if "valor" in out:
out["valor"] = 14.99
return {"content": json.dumps(out, ensure_ascii=False)}
@@ -1283,3 +1284,152 @@ async def test_prevalidation_parameter_message_is_used_once_without_changing_tra
# One-shot: subsequent clarification falls back to the normal prompt.
assert runtime.transaction_clarification_message(state) != expected
assert "transaction_parameter_message_override" not in state
class _TemporalFallbackRuntime(AgentRuntimeMixin):
def __init__(self):
from types import SimpleNamespace
self.calls = []
self.llm = None
self.tool_router = SimpleNamespace(
registry=SimpleNamespace(
get_tool=lambda name: SimpleNamespace(
requires=["subject"],
args_schema={"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do serviço ou VAS alvo do cancelamento."}},
description="Cancela o serviço VAS selecionado pelo cliente.",
confirmation_required=True,
tool_type="transactional",
)
),
resolve_execution_policy=lambda name, arguments=None: {
"operation_type": "transactional",
"require_confirmation": True,
"requires": ["subject"],
"pre_validation": {"enabled": True, "tool": "validar_vas_subject", "fail_open": False},
},
)
async def _extract_transaction_parameters_current_only(self, state, *, tool_name, missing_parameters, known_arguments=None):
# Simula o collector tradicional interpretando literalmente a fala atual.
return {"subject": "dezenove e noventa e nove"}
async def _reconcile_transaction_parameters(self, state, *, tool_name, parameter_names, known_arguments=None):
# Simula o reconciliador temporal usando tools.yaml + contexto newest->oldest.
return {
"values": {"subject": "Tamboro Mensal"},
"decisions": {"subject": "resolved"},
"provenance": {"subject": "history:2"},
"clear_fields": [],
}
async def _call_mcp_tool(self, tool_name, arguments, state):
self.calls.append((tool_name, dict(arguments)))
if tool_name == "validar_vas_subject":
subject = arguments.get("subject")
if subject == "Tamboro Mensal":
return {"ok": True, "tool_name": tool_name, "result": {"eligible": True, "status": "ELIGIBLE"}}
return {"ok": True, "tool_name": tool_name, "result": {
"eligible": False,
"status": "NEEDS_PARAMETER",
"parameter": "subject",
"reason": "subject_not_resolved",
}}
return {"ok": True, "tool_name": tool_name, "result": {"status": "OK"}}
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_temporal_reconciler_is_fallback_after_traditional_candidate_fails_prevalidation():
runtime = _TemporalFallbackRuntime()
state = {
"user_text": "é a de dezenove e noventa e nove",
"sanitized_input": "é a de dezenove e noventa e nove",
"route": "contestacao_agent",
"intent": "state:COLLECTING_CONTESTACAO_PARAMETERS",
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"selected_tool_call": {"tool_name": "cancelar_vas_avulso", "arguments": {}},
"active_transaction": {
"transaction_id": "tx-1",
"tool_name": "cancelar_vas_avulso",
"arguments": {},
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"started_from_intent": "contas_vas_cancel",
"requires": ["subject"],
"parameter_schema": {"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "Nome do serviço ou VAS alvo do cancelamento."}},
"tool_description": "Cancela o serviço VAS selecionado pelo cliente.",
"parameter_conversational_context": (
"user: não reconheço esse Tamboro Mensal na minha fatura\n"
"assistant: identifiquei Tamboro Mensal por R$ 14,99 e R$ 19,99"
),
},
"context": {},
}
result = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state, tools=[])
validations = [(name, args.get("subject")) for name, args in runtime.calls if name == "validar_vas_subject"]
assert validations == [
("validar_vas_subject", "dezenove e noventa e nove"),
("validar_vas_subject", "Tamboro Mensal"),
]
assert state["transaction_parameter_collection"]["mode"] == "current_turn"
assert state["transaction_parameter_reconciliation"]["trigger"] == "prevalidation_needs_parameter"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert state["transaction_status"] == "AWAITING_CONFIRMATION"
assert result[-1]["awaiting_confirmation"] is True
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_collecting_parameters_materializes_router_cache_before_current_only_t6_regression():
"""T6 regression: router-resolved subject must enter active arguments.
The router already consumed the pending subject in the same turn. A subsequent
current-only extraction over the literal message "sim" must not be required to
rediscover it, and temporal reconciliation must not leave it only as metadata.
"""
runtime = _ContestRuntime()
state = {
"user_text": "sim",
"sanitized_input": "sim",
"route": "contestacao_agent",
"active_agent": "contestacao_agent",
"intent": "state:COLLECTING_CONTESTACAO_PARAMETERS",
"route_decision": {
"route": "contestacao_agent",
"agent": "contestacao_agent",
"intent": "state:COLLECTING_CONTESTACAO_PARAMETERS",
"metadata": {
"transaction_turn_consumed": True,
"transaction_parameter_values": {"subject": "Tamboro Mensal"},
"transaction_parameter_source": "llm",
"transaction_parameter_missing_before": ["subject"],
},
},
"transaction_status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"missing_parameters": ["subject"],
"active_transaction": {
"transaction_id": "tx-t6-router-cache",
"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca",
"arguments": {"valor": 19.99},
"status": "COLLECTING_PARAMETERS",
"started_from_intent": "contas_contestation",
"requires": ["subject", "valor"],
"parameter_schema": {
"subject": {"type": "string", "description": "item concreto da fatura"},
"valor": {"type": "number", "description": "valor da cobrança"},
},
"tool_description": "Contesta cobrança validada",
},
"selected_tool_call": {
"tool_name": "contestar_cobranca",
"arguments": {"valor": 19.99},
},
}
results = await runtime.execute_tools_for_intent(state, tools=[])
assert results[-1]["transaction_status"] == "AWAITING_CONFIRMATION"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert state["pending_tool_call"]["arguments"]["valor"] == 19.99
assert state["active_transaction"]["arguments"]["subject"] == "Tamboro Mensal"
assert state["missing_parameters"] == []
collection = state["transaction_parameter_collection"]
assert collection["router_resolved_fields"] == ["subject"]
assert runtime.calls == []