New features: Domain_Requested_LLM_Composition, Domain_Requested_RAG, Offline_Workflow_Regression, Pause_Resume_Workflow, Voice_Interruption_Replay, Workflow_Error_Recovery, Durable Idempotency, Workflow_Pause_Resume, Dynamic_Transaction_States, Post_Finalization_Replay, Retrieval_Tool_Guardrails

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-19 09:25:38 -03:00
parent 23d32bbcfc
commit 560e79d21b
89 changed files with 6261 additions and 864 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
# Durable Idempotency
> `agent_framework_oci` feature — English guide.
**Main implementation:** `idempotency.py`
---
### 1. What it is
Prevents the same critical operation from executing twice, including when a retry lands on another replica/pod.
### 2. Problem it solves
Production agents should not rely on prompts alone to “do the right thing”. This feature moves a specific responsibility into a controlled framework layer, reducing unpredictable behavior and duplicate domain-agent code.
### 3. Simplified flow
```text
request
idempotency key
durable store
├─ exists → return previous result
└─ missing → execute → persist result
```
### 4. How it works internally
`create_idempotency_store(settings, ...)` chooses a backend according to configuration/platform. The framework provides `IdempotencyStore` and `InMemoryIdempotencyStore`, but distributed production should prefer shared storage. Settings include `IDEMPOTENCY_PROVIDER`, `IDEMPOTENCY_REQUIRE_DURABLE`, and `IDEMPOTENCY_TTL_SECONDS`.
Idempotency is different from retry: retry repeats an attempt; idempotency guarantees that repetition does not create another side effect.
### 5. How to enable/configure
Exact activation depends on the template/agent. Check framework settings, YAML configuration, and the service template. Not every feature requires a global flag: some are activated by the contract returned from a tool/workflow.
### 6. Example
```text
Pod A receives cancellation
→ key=customer:service:operation
→ executes
→ stores result
Pod A crashes
Pod B receives retry
→ same key
→ finds stored result
→ DOES NOT cancel again
```
### 7. Telemetry and observability
When the feature participates in an agent execution, preserve `request_id`, `trace_id`, `session_id`, `agent_id`, `message_id`, and other correlation keys in state/events. This makes the decision observable through Langfuse/Observer without embedding observability logic in the domain.
### 8. How to test
1. Add a unit test for the core behavior.
2. Add a runtime integration test when state spans multiple turns.
3. Test the happy path and at least one failure/rejection path.
4. Confirm retries/replays do not duplicate side effects for transactional features.
5. In production, also validate telemetry and ID correlation.
### 9. Common mistakes
- An in-memory store across multiple pods is not durable idempotency.
- A key that is too broad may block legitimate operations; too narrow may allow duplicates.
- TTL should match the real retry/replay window.
### 10. Relationship with other features
Use this feature together with the framework's horizontal capabilities rather than creating a parallel implementation in domain-agent code. For transactional journeys, pay special attention to **Clarification**, **Pause/Resume**, **Durable Idempotency**, **Workflow Error Recovery**, and **Guardrails**.
### 11. Repository references
- `libs/agent_framework/src/agent_framework/idempotency.py`
- `Tuning-Performance/`
- `Documentacao/`
- `libs/agent_framework/docs/`