Enhance ADB-S to ADB-D business cases
Some checks failed
Deploy Skill to OCI / deploy (push) Failing after 19s
Diagram validators / diagram-validators (push) Failing after 22s
SKILL.md sync / check-sync (push) Successful in 17s
SKU Catalog Refresh / refresh-and-discover (push) Failing after 30s
KB Health Check / check-links (push) Successful in 57s
Some checks failed
Deploy Skill to OCI / deploy (push) Failing after 19s
Diagram validators / diagram-validators (push) Failing after 22s
SKILL.md sync / check-sync (push) Successful in 17s
SKU Catalog Refresh / refresh-and-discover (push) Failing after 30s
KB Health Check / check-links (push) Successful in 57s
This commit is contained in:
89
examples/adbs-to-adbd-business-case-synthetic.yaml
Normal file
89
examples/adbs-to-adbd-business-case-synthetic.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
||||
business_case:
|
||||
customer_name: "Synthetic Commerce Co."
|
||||
cover_subtitle: "ADB-S to ADB-D Migration Business Case"
|
||||
prepared_by: "Diego Cabrera"
|
||||
prepared_by_role: "Solutions Architect"
|
||||
date: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
executive_summary: >
|
||||
Synthetic Commerce Co. is evaluating a move from ADB-S to ADB-D for a
|
||||
fraud analytics workload where predictable performance, read-path cleanup,
|
||||
and storage economics are more important than a pure near-term cost takeout.
|
||||
drivers:
|
||||
primary: "Stabilize fraud analytics performance while keeping the business case auditable."
|
||||
urgency: "Validate capacity, TCO crossover, and migration bridge assumptions before procurement."
|
||||
adbs_to_adbd:
|
||||
license_model: BYOL
|
||||
discount_pct: 0.11
|
||||
ecpu_per_db_node: 760
|
||||
current:
|
||||
label: "ADB-S As-Is"
|
||||
workload_ecpu: 2400
|
||||
storage_tb: 96
|
||||
read_architecture: "Refreshable/read clones serve application reads; standby is not the application read path."
|
||||
target:
|
||||
label: "ADB-D Dedicated"
|
||||
workload_ecpu: 2400
|
||||
storage_tb: 96
|
||||
db_nodes: 5
|
||||
storage_servers: 3
|
||||
read_architecture: "Local ADG read-only standby serves application reads; steady-state clones retired."
|
||||
forecasts:
|
||||
- period: "24M"
|
||||
display_label: "Year 2"
|
||||
as_is:
|
||||
workload_ecpu: 3150
|
||||
storage_tb: 128
|
||||
to_be:
|
||||
workload_ecpu: 3150
|
||||
storage_tb: 128
|
||||
db_nodes: 6
|
||||
storage_servers: 3
|
||||
- period: "36M"
|
||||
display_label: "Year 3"
|
||||
as_is:
|
||||
workload_ecpu: 3900
|
||||
storage_tb: 166
|
||||
to_be:
|
||||
workload_ecpu: 3900
|
||||
storage_tb: 166
|
||||
db_nodes: 8
|
||||
storage_servers: 3
|
||||
goldengate:
|
||||
mode: migration_bridge_only
|
||||
ocpus: 4
|
||||
bridge_months: 3
|
||||
bridge_one_time_cost: 0
|
||||
storage_economics:
|
||||
base_break_even_tb: 91
|
||||
business_impact:
|
||||
business_impact_per_hour: 0
|
||||
crossover_chart:
|
||||
y_axis_min: 1.5
|
||||
y_axis_max: 3.5
|
||||
y_axis_major_unit: 0.5
|
||||
roadmap:
|
||||
total_duration: "12 weeks"
|
||||
phases:
|
||||
- name: "Define"
|
||||
duration: "2 weeks"
|
||||
deliverables: ["Baseline current BOM", "Confirm success metrics"]
|
||||
- name: "Design"
|
||||
duration: "4 weeks"
|
||||
deliverables: ["Dedicated capacity plan", "Read-path validation"]
|
||||
- name: "Deliver"
|
||||
duration: "6 weeks"
|
||||
deliverables: ["Migration bridge", "Cutover rehearsal"]
|
||||
recommendation:
|
||||
summary: "Proceed with detailed design for the ADB-D Dedicated target, validating the utilization, storage break-even, and GoldenGate bridge assumptions before final commercial approval."
|
||||
next_steps:
|
||||
- action: "Confirm workload ECPU demand and storage forecast"
|
||||
owner: "Customer"
|
||||
deadline: "Before design sign-off"
|
||||
- action: "Validate ADB-D DB node and storage server reservation"
|
||||
owner: "Oracle"
|
||||
deadline: "Before procurement"
|
||||
deck_validation:
|
||||
forbidden_phrases:
|
||||
- "OCI Annual"
|
||||
- "FTE-year"
|
||||
- "if 4x3 is selected"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user