diegoecab/oci-deal-accelerator
1
1
Fork 2
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

initial version

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Diego Cabrera
2026-03-18 18:03:44 -03:00
commit 9d269e902b
136 changed files with 28175 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

112
kb/competitive/aws-mapping.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
# Competitive Mapping: AWS → OCI
# Honest comparison — advantages AND disadvantages
service_mapping:
compute:
aws: "EC2"
oci: "OCI Compute"
oci_advantage:
- "Consistent pricing (no per-second billing complexity)"
- "Flex shapes — pay for exact OCPUs/memory needed"
- "Dense I/O shapes with local NVMe included"
aws_advantage:
- "Broader instance family selection"
- "Spot instances (wider availability than OCI Preemptible)"
- "Graviton ecosystem maturity vs Ampere"
notes: "OCI compute is generally 30-50% cheaper for equivalent configurations"
kubernetes:
aws: "EKS"
oci: "OKE"
oci_advantage:
- "Free control plane (EKS charges $0.10/hr = ~$73/month)"
- "Virtual Nodes (serverless) option"
aws_advantage:
- "Larger ecosystem (Fargate, App Mesh, more add-ons)"
- "More community resources and tooling"
database_oracle:
aws: "RDS Oracle / Oracle on EC2"
oci: "ADB-S / DBCS / ExaCS"
oci_advantage:
- "Autonomous Database — no equivalent in AWS"
- "Exadata performance for Oracle workloads"
- "BYOL pricing ~50-75% cheaper than AWS RDS Oracle"
- "Native Oracle features (RAC, Data Guard, Advanced Compression)"
- "Direct migration path with ZDM/DMS"
aws_advantage:
- "Multi-engine flexibility (same tooling for Oracle, PostgreSQL, MySQL)"
- "Aurora for PostgreSQL/MySQL is excellent"
notes: "This is OCI's strongest competitive advantage. Lead with database."
database_mysql:
aws: "RDS MySQL / Aurora MySQL"
oci: "MySQL HeatWave"
oci_advantage:
- "HeatWave in-memory query accelerator (up to 400x faster analytics)"
- "Combined OLTP + analytics without ETL"
aws_advantage:
- "Aurora is a mature, battle-tested platform"
- "Broader integration with AWS analytics stack"
object_storage:
aws: "S3"
oci: "OCI Object Storage"
oci_advantage:
- "No data retrieval charges for Standard tier"
- "Cheaper per-GB pricing"
aws_advantage:
- "S3 ecosystem is unmatched (integrations, tooling, community)"
- "S3 Intelligent Tiering is more mature"
networking:
aws: "VPC / Direct Connect / ALB/NLB"
oci: "VCN / FastConnect / Flexible LB"
oci_advantage:
- "Free inter-AZ data transfer (AWS charges $0.01/GB)"
- "Free inter-VCN data transfer within same region via DRG"
- "Significantly cheaper outbound data transfer"
- "Service Gateway (free access to OCI services without internet)"
aws_advantage:
- "More load balancer features (ALB path-based routing)"
- "Broader Direct Connect partner ecosystem"
notes: "Networking cost savings are a major OCI differentiator. Quantify them."
security:
aws: "IAM / GuardDuty / SecurityHub / KMS"
oci: "IAM / Cloud Guard / Security Zones / Vault"
oci_advantage:
- "Cloud Guard is free (GuardDuty is per-event pricing)"
- "Security Zones enforce compliance at resource creation"
- "Data Safe included free for Autonomous Database"
aws_advantage:
- "Broader security partner ecosystem"
- "More mature SIEM integrations"
observability:
aws: "CloudWatch / X-Ray / CloudTrail"
oci: "Monitoring / APM / Audit / Logging Analytics"
oci_advantage:
- "Generous free tier for monitoring"
- "Logging Analytics is powerful for centralized analysis"
aws_advantage:
- "CloudWatch is deeply integrated with all services"
- "More third-party observability integrations"
competitive_positioning:
lead_with:
- "Oracle Database cost savings (BYOL, Exadata, Autonomous)"
- "Network cost savings (free inter-AZ, cheap egress)"
- "Overall price/performance for equivalent configurations"
honest_gaps:
- "Smaller service catalog than AWS"
- "Fewer regions (though expanding rapidly)"
- "Smaller community and ecosystem"
- "Less mature serverless/event-driven offerings"
neutralize:
- "Enterprise support: Oracle Premier Support is equivalent to AWS Enterprise"
- "Terraform support: full parity via OCI Terraform provider"
- "Multi-cloud: OCI Multicloud with Azure (Oracle Database@Azure)"
- "Multi-cloud: Oracle Database@AWS (GA in us-east-1, us-west-2, us-east-2, eu-central-1, ap-northeast-1 + expanding to 20+ regions)"
- "Database@AWS: co-located Exadata in AWS AZ, ~200-400μs same-AZ latency, single AWS bill"
- "Database@AWS limitation: ADB-D only, no ADB-S Serverless — requires Exadata dedicated infra"

54
kb/competitive/azure-mapping.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
---
last_verified: 2026-03-14
description: OCI to Azure service mapping for competitive positioning.
---
service_mapping:
database:
- oci: "ADB-S"
azure: "Azure SQL Managed Instance / Azure Database for PostgreSQL"
oci_advantage: |
ADB-S runs actual Oracle Database. Azure SQL MI is SQL Server only.
No native Oracle database service on Azure.
Oracle on Azure VMs loses Exadata performance and autonomous operations.
azure_advantage: "Native SQL Server support if migrating from SQL Server."
- oci: "ExaCS"
azure: "Oracle Database@Azure (ExaCS in Azure datacenters)"
notes: |
Oracle Database@Azure is ExaCS running in Azure datacenters with
direct connectivity to Azure services. Available in select regions.
This is a partnership offering, not a competitive comparison.
compute:
- oci: "OCI Compute"
azure: "Azure Virtual Machines"
oci_advantage: "Flexible shapes, lower cost for Oracle workloads."
azure_advantage: "Deeper Microsoft ecosystem integration, Hybrid Benefit."
networking:
- oci: "OCI Interconnect with Azure"
azure: "Azure ExpressRoute with OCI"
notes: |
OCI and Azure have a direct interconnect in multiple regions.
Low-latency (<2ms) connectivity for hybrid deployments.
Enables Oracle DB on OCI with apps on Azure.
pricing_comparison:
notes: |
For Oracle workloads, OCI is significantly cheaper:
- No Oracle license surcharge on OCI
- Exadata performance not available on Azure
- BYOL works better on OCI
- Data egress cheaper on OCI
common_objections:
- objection: "We're an Azure shop — Microsoft is our strategic partner"
response: |
Oracle Database@Azure allows running OCI database services directly
in Azure datacenters. Your team stays in the Azure portal while
getting OCI database performance and economics.
- objection: "We prefer Azure SQL for our databases"
response: |
For SQL Server workloads, Azure SQL is excellent. For Oracle database
workloads that must remain Oracle, OCI provides superior performance
and cost. Consider multi-cloud: Azure for .NET/SQL Server, OCI for Oracle.

85
kb/competitive/common-objections.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
---
last_verified: 2026-03-14
description: Common customer objections about OCI and evidence-based responses.
---
objections:
- id: OBJ-001
category: market
objection: "OCI is a niche cloud — AWS/Azure are the leaders"
response: |
OCI is the #4 cloud globally and growing fastest in database PaaS.
For Oracle database workloads specifically, OCI is the leader:
- Only cloud with Exadata hardware
- Only cloud with Autonomous Database
- Best Oracle license portability
The question isn't "best cloud overall" but "best cloud for this workload."
evidence: "Gartner, IDC reports on cloud database market"
- id: OBJ-002
category: risk
objection: "What if Oracle EOLs or changes OCI pricing?"
response: |
OCI pricing has only decreased since launch. Oracle's cloud investment
is $50B+ in CapEx. OCI is Oracle's strategic platform — not a side project.
Contractual pricing protection exists via Annual Flex and Universal Credits.
mitigation: "Use annual flex contracts with pricing guarantees"
- id: OBJ-003
category: skills
objection: "Our team has no OCI experience"
response: |
ADB-S reduces DBA workload by 80% (no patching, tuning, scaling).
OCI console follows familiar cloud patterns. Terraform provider is mature.
Oracle provides free training and certification. Typical ramp-up is 2-4 weeks.
mitigation: "Include training budget in migration plan"
- id: OBJ-004
category: features
objection: "OCI doesn't have as many services as AWS"
response: |
True for breadth (AWS has 200+ services). For database and enterprise
workloads, OCI feature parity is strong. Key services are GA:
- Compute, networking, storage, Kubernetes, serverless
- Monitoring, logging, IAM, security
- Queue, Streaming, API Gateway
What matters is whether OCI has what *you* need, not a raw count.
- id: OBJ-005
category: cost
objection: "We can get better pricing from AWS/Azure"
response: |
OCI list prices are already 30-50% below AWS for equivalent configs.
For Oracle specifically:
- No Oracle license surcharge on OCI
- BYOL discount is deeper on OCI
- Data egress is 10x cheaper
Request a detailed cost comparison with matched configurations.
- id: OBJ-006
category: migration
objection: "Migration is too risky and expensive"
response: |
Oracle provides free migration tools (ZDM, DMS) and migration credits.
Phased migration reduces risk. ADB-S migrations from on-prem Exadata
are well-documented with reference architectures. Typical timeline is
8-16 weeks for database migration.
mitigation: "Phased migration with rollback plan at each phase"
- id: OBJ-007
category: vendor_lock
objection: "We don't want vendor lock-in with Oracle"
response: |
You're already locked into Oracle Database (the software). OCI doesn't
add lock-in — it reduces cost and operational burden of running Oracle.
OCI also supports open source: PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kubernetes, Terraform.
If you want to reduce Oracle dependency, that's a separate conversation
about database modernization, not cloud choice.
- id: OBJ-008
category: availability
objection: "OCI has fewer regions than AWS"
response: |
OCI has 50+ public cloud regions globally, covering all major markets.
If a specific region is required, check current availability.
For Oracle Database@Azure, OCI services run inside Azure regions.