6 CLI improvements from MCP integration testing + deck bug fixes: - kb_cli.py: --json on search, new arch-search and ecal-score subcommands, _load_yaml handles multi-document YAML (fixes health command on 32 files) - findings_cli.py: --json on search/list/stats, filter flags on search (--product, --severity, --tag, --client, --status, --category) - validate-architecture.py: --profile optional, --output defaults to stdout - common-objections.yaml + ecal-artefacts-catalog.yaml: merge front matter - oci_deck_gen.py: fix slide 9 cost_notes char iteration, fix slide 12 migration field mapping (duration/milestones), dynamic phase spacing - proposal-spec.yaml: replace real name with fictional Carlos Mendoza All 14 skill options validated with generated deliverables. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
47 lines
2.7 KiB
JSON
47 lines
2.7 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"query": "ADB-S vs AWS Aurora / Azure SQL",
|
|
"aws_database_mappings": [],
|
|
"azure_database_mappings": [
|
|
{
|
|
"oci": "ADB-S",
|
|
"azure": "Azure SQL Managed Instance / Azure Database for PostgreSQL",
|
|
"oci_advantage": "ADB-S runs actual Oracle Database. Azure SQL MI is SQL Server only.\nNo native Oracle database service on Azure.\nOracle on Azure VMs loses Exadata performance and autonomous operations.\n",
|
|
"azure_advantage": "Native SQL Server support if migrating from SQL Server."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"oci": "ExaCS",
|
|
"azure": "Oracle Database@Azure (ExaCS in Azure datacenters)",
|
|
"notes": "Oracle Database@Azure is ExaCS running in Azure datacenters with\ndirect connectivity to Azure services. Available in select regions.\nThis is a partnership offering, not a competitive comparison.\n"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"common_objections": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "OBJ-001",
|
|
"category": "market",
|
|
"objection": "OCI is a niche cloud \u2014 AWS/Azure are the leaders",
|
|
"response": "OCI is the #4 cloud globally and growing fastest in database PaaS.\nFor Oracle database workloads specifically, OCI is the leader:\n- Only cloud with Exadata hardware\n- Only cloud with Autonomous Database\n- Best Oracle license portability\nThe question isn't \"best cloud overall\" but \"best cloud for this workload.\"\n",
|
|
"evidence": "Gartner, IDC reports on cloud database market"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "OBJ-002",
|
|
"category": "risk",
|
|
"objection": "What if Oracle EOLs or changes OCI pricing?",
|
|
"response": "OCI pricing has only decreased since launch. Oracle's cloud investment\nis $50B+ in CapEx. OCI is Oracle's strategic platform \u2014 not a side project.\nContractual pricing protection exists via Annual Flex and Universal Credits.\n",
|
|
"mitigation": "Use annual flex contracts with pricing guarantees"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "OBJ-003",
|
|
"category": "skills",
|
|
"objection": "Our team has no OCI experience",
|
|
"response": "ADB-S reduces DBA workload by 80% (no patching, tuning, scaling).\nOCI console follows familiar cloud patterns. Terraform provider is mature.\nOracle provides free training and certification. Typical ramp-up is 2-4 weeks.\n",
|
|
"mitigation": "Include training budget in migration plan"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "OBJ-004",
|
|
"category": "features",
|
|
"objection": "OCI doesn't have as many services as AWS",
|
|
"response": "True for breadth (AWS has 200+ services). For database and enterprise\nworkloads, OCI feature parity is strong. Key services are GA:\n- Compute, networking, storage, Kubernetes, serverless\n- Monitoring, logging, IAM, security\n- Queue, Streaming, API Gateway\nWhat matters is whether OCI has what *you* need, not a raw count.\n"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|