--- last_verified: 2026-03-14 description: OCI to Azure service mapping for competitive positioning. --- service_mapping: database: - oci: "ADB-S" azure: "Azure SQL Managed Instance / Azure Database for PostgreSQL" oci_advantage: | ADB-S runs actual Oracle Database. Azure SQL MI is SQL Server only. No native Oracle database service on Azure. Oracle on Azure VMs loses Exadata performance and autonomous operations. azure_advantage: "Native SQL Server support if migrating from SQL Server." - oci: "ExaCS" azure: "Oracle Database@Azure (ExaCS in Azure datacenters)" notes: | Oracle Database@Azure is ExaCS running in Azure datacenters with direct connectivity to Azure services. Available in select regions. This is a partnership offering, not a competitive comparison. compute: - oci: "OCI Compute" azure: "Azure Virtual Machines" oci_advantage: "Flexible shapes, lower cost for Oracle workloads." azure_advantage: "Deeper Microsoft ecosystem integration, Hybrid Benefit." networking: - oci: "OCI Interconnect with Azure" azure: "Azure ExpressRoute with OCI" notes: | OCI and Azure have a direct interconnect in multiple regions. Low-latency (<2ms) connectivity for hybrid deployments. Enables Oracle DB on OCI with apps on Azure. pricing_comparison: notes: | For Oracle workloads, OCI is significantly cheaper: - No Oracle license surcharge on OCI - Exadata performance not available on Azure - BYOL works better on OCI - Data egress cheaper on OCI common_objections: - objection: "We're an Azure shop — Microsoft is our strategic partner" response: | Oracle Database@Azure allows running OCI database services directly in Azure datacenters. Your team stays in the Azure portal while getting OCI database performance and economics. - objection: "We prefer Azure SQL for our databases" response: | For SQL Server workloads, Azure SQL is excellent. For Oracle database workloads that must remain Oracle, OCI provides superior performance and cost. Consider multi-cloud: Azure for .NET/SQL Server, OCI for Oracle.